|
أرشيف المنتدى هنا نقل الموضوعات المكررة والروابط التى لا تعمل |
|
أدوات الموضوع | ابحث في الموضوع | انواع عرض الموضوع |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() اقتباس:
I would definitely use a singular in "Ten days/weeks/months/years is a long time to wait." If "ten minutes"" really means "a period of ten minutes" then I'm happy with a singular: "After ten minutes has passed ". But if you want to emphasise the cycle of time, then "have" sounds better. Ten minutes have passed - . look my dear "Ten minutes"" can be either singular or plural, depending on what is meant:"After ten minutes has passed you can meet him." [a ten-year period] "After ten minutes have passed you can meet him"." "Ten years" as a plural seems a longer time (tenminutes passing, one by one) than "ten minutes" as a singular (a ten-minuter period). To me "arduous" draws out the time, and makes "ten minutes" less workable as a singular: "A short ten minutes has brought us to this point." "An arduous ten years have passed." "Ten minutes" by itself would not need an article since it has a number, but when modified (by "short" or "arduous"), it does need the "an". "An" in such a construction does not make it singular: "A mere ten people were present for the ceremony." I hope it is clear now my dear Best Regards
|
العلامات المرجعية |
|
|