|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
their attitudes toward the Soviets
and the Chinese. We, perhaps, underestimated their ability even then to stand up against external influences-from all directions. Today, this has changed . We and they have adjusted to radi cally new circumstances. PRESENT SITUATION Its first annual budget was only $6 million , and few knew where that would be found . In the other three countries , France played a dominant role, largely to the exclusion of other outside influences. Americans in both government and the private sector, nevertheless, were be ginning to learn about North Africa . They were beginning to be aware of its peoples and their quest for freedom . We realized earlier than most that independ ence was coming and coming rapidly . But these were , at that time, side issues . Our concern as a nation then was the relationship of this area to the emerging position of the Soviet Union and to its containment. Before mis siles and long- range bombers, our Strategic Air Command bases in Morocco were considered vital for our national security . In 1951 , also, we made the decision to seek to retain , in Libya, an important training base for our Air Forces in Europe. We ulti mately reached agreement and committed ourselves initially to pay Libya $4 million a year in economic assistance. Ten years later, the situation had changed dramatically, and we had changed with it . Morocco and Tunisia were independent. General De Gaulle had stood in Algiers and had spoken one of history's great ambiguities, " Je vous ai compris." ( " I have under stood you ." ) Libya had begun to realize that its deserts covered vast resources of oil . In those ten years, U.S. poli cies had moved, too. President Eisenhower had agreed to the evacuation of our air bases in Morocco . Our earlier interest and confidence in Tunisia was fol lowed by a pledge of long- term development aid-without condi tions or demands for facilities . In 1964, we agreed in principle with the Government of Libya to the evacuation of our military facili ties whenever they were not wanted. We were preparing to help independent Algeria with substantial food and technical aid . Each of these countries, as they became independent, looked to us in a special way. They sought alternatives to full dependence upon the former metropole . It was not yet fash ionable to turn massively to the Soviets or the Chinese. Morocco , because of early links with the United States , encouragement by individual Americans, and the presence of our bases, expected special help. Algeria, despite harboring a resentment because of our sup port for the French , looked to us as an early sympathizer and benefactor. Tunisia , under the leadership of Habib Bourguiba , remem bered earlier help and encourage ment and looked to us. Libya saw in us and the British the primary sources of critical financial help. The Libyan King felt both an indebtedness to us for our support at the United Nations for Libyan independence and territorial unity despite Soviet opposition, and a depend ence upon us . Ten years ago , we were deeply involved . These nations had ex pectations of us. We expected to find friends and support, particu larly against growing inroads of Soviet influence . We did tend to judge nations in those days by Each of the four countries is now fully independent. Each has, further, demon strated its independence in poli cies toward the former metro poles and toward other coun tries. Each country has diversi fied its relationships. None is any longer dependent predominantly upon a single power, politically or economically. Each in its par ticular way has sought to qualify as " nonaligned ." The area has seen major politi cal upheavals which have changed the leadership and, in the case of Libya , the basic reorientation of the country . There has been a dramatic discovery and development of resources, primarily oil and gas, in the last ten years . The direct importance of the area economi cally to Europe has expanded . All of this has brought a very basic change in the relationship between North Africa and the United States . Except for the use of com munications facilities at one Moroccan base, we no longer have any military facilities in North Africa. The proposition of economic assistance provided by the United States has steadily declined as European countries have assumed a larger share . U.S. grant military assistance 2 |
| العلامات المرجعية |
| أدوات الموضوع | |
| انواع عرض الموضوع | |
|
|